EUROPEAN FOUNDATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Training and conferences 2010/11/02

“Improving human rights qualifications within the field of International and European Union law” – first

The Association of Polish Lawyers in Lithuania together with the European Foundation of Human Rights set out series of lectures

EFHR 2010/11/01

Within the OSCE the protection of national minorities in a part of the policy

This statement is the conclusion, to which the participants of the recent lecture have come, the lecture being a part

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF NEKVEDAVIČIUS v. LITHUANIA – Application no. 1471/05 (2013)

Facts: The case concerns the ownership of a plot of land in the city centre of Kaunas, Lithuania. The plot

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF NOVIKAS v. LITHUANIA – Application no._45756/05 (2010)

Facts: The applicant, Andrejus Novikas, is a Lithuanian national. Following a report to the police by two witnesses, on April

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF PADALEVIČIUS v. LITHUANIA – Application no. 12278/03

Facts: The applicant, Juozas Padalevičius, is a Lithuanian national. The case concerned Mr Padalevičius’s complaint about the excessive length of

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF PAKSAS v. LITHUANIA – Application no. 34932/04 (2011)

Facts: The applicant, Rolandas Paksas, is a former President of Lithuania who was removed from office by Parliament following impeachment

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF RAMANAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA – Application no_74420/01 (2008)

Facts: The applicant, Kęstas Ramanauskas, is a Lithuanian national. He worked as a prosecutor in the Kaišiadorys region. He submitted

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF SAVENKOVAS v. LITHUANIA – Application no. 871/02 (2009)

Facts: The case concerned Mr Savenkovas’ complaint about the conditions of his detention in Vilnius prisons until July 2003 and

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF SIDABRAS AND DŽIAUTAS v. LITHUANIA – Applications no. 55480/00 and 59330/00

Facts: The case concerns two applicants, Mr Juozas Sidabras and Mr Kęstutis Džiautas, who are both Lithuanian nationals. They both

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF UŽUKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA – Application no. 16965/04 (2010)

Facts: The case concerns the complaint by the applicant about the Lithuanian courts having taken decisions in his case on

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF L. V. LITHUANIA – Application no._27527/03 (2007)

Facts: The case concerned an application brought by a Lithuanian national, Mr L. At birth he was registered as a

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF MALININAS v. LITHUANIA – Application no. 10071/04 (2008)

Facts: In 2003 the Applicant, together with his accomplice, was convicted by the Kaišiadorys District Court of attempted drug dealing

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF PYRANTIENĖ v. LITHUANIA – Application no. 45092/07 (2013)

Facts: The case concerned Ms Pyrantienė’s complaint about the level of compensation she had received when the Lithuanian authorities had

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF VALAŠINAS v. LITHUANIA – Application number 44558/98 (2001)

Facts: The Applicant, Mr Juozas Valašinas, is a Lithuanian national. The case concerned the conditions of the Applicant’s detention in

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF UŽUKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA – Application no. 16965/04

In the Chamber’s judgment in the case of UŽUKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF LALAS v. LITHUANIA – Application no. 13109/04 (2011)

Facts: Mr Lalas is a Lithuanian national. The case concerned his complaint that an undercover police officer had entrapped him

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA – Application no. 33234/07 (2013)

Facts: On February 2001, Ms Valiulienė applied to the city district court to bring a private prosecution, stating that she

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF VARNAS v. LITHUANIA – Application no._42615/06 (2013)

Facts: The case concerned the applicant’s complaint that he had been denied conjugal visits from his wife, despite repeated requests,

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF KUDREVIČIUS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA – Application no._37553/05 (2013)

Facts: In May 2003 the Lithuanian authorities issued farmers with permits to hold peaceful assemblies in selected areas. The farmers

ECtHR 2010/02/11

CASE OF KASPEROVIČIUS V. LITHUANIA – Application no._54872/08 (2012)

Facts: In October 2006, the applicant was detained for seven days at the Anykščiai Police Remand Facility. The applicant complained

Blog Page